Request a Same Day Telephone Consultation
Most common in the restaurant industry, employees are called into work for an early shift and then during the lull are asked to leave and a few hours later to return for a second shift. When an employee works two shifts in one day, the employee is entitled to one extra hour of pay at the prevailing minimum wage. Many small employers do not realize this. Failure to pay this required additional one hour of pay can lead to tremendous wage penalties.
That said, in some cases the one hour of pay may in fact not be owed. In Aleman v. Airtouch Cellular, 202 Cal.App.4th 117 (2011), the employee’s claim for split-shift compensation was rejected because every time the employee worked a split shift (a work schedule interrupted by “non-paid, nonworking periods”), the employee was paid a total amount greater than the minimum wage for all hours worked plus one additional hour. Although the employer technically won the lawsuit, the employer was denied an award of attorney’s fees because the employee’s claim were based on California Labor Code § 1194 (failure to pay the minimum wage or legally required overtime). Labor Code § 1194 only permits an award of attorney fees and costs to the “plaintiff – employee,” not to the employer. Labor Code §218.5, on the other hand, permits an award of attorney’s to the “prevailing party” in any action “brought for the nonpayment of wages, fringe benefits, or health and welfare or pension fund contributions” if “any party to the action requests attorney’s fees and costs upon the initiation of the action.”
Tags: split shift
Posted In: Employment Law News
Blog Categories:Business Law Bulletin
Search YLC Blog:
Subscribe to Updates:Interested in receiving this blog? You may add this blog to your feeds by clicking here: Subscribe
Disclaimer: The information presented on this web site was prepared by Melissa C. Marsh for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The information provided in my articles and alerts should not be relied upon, or used as a substitute for professional legal advice from an attorney you retain to advise or represent you. Your use of this Internet site does not create an attorney- client relationship. Transmission of this article is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. All uses of the contents of this site, other than personal uses, are prohibited. You may print or email a copy of any information posted on this web site for your own personal, non-commercial, use, but you may not publish any of the articles or posts on this web site without the Express Written Permission of Melissa C. Marsh.
Located in Los Angeles, California, the Law Office of Melissa C. Marsh handles business law and corporation law matters as a lawyer for clients throughout Los Angeles including Burbank, Sherman Oaks, Studio City, Valley Village, North Hollywood, Woodland Hills, Hollywood, West LA as well as Riverside County, San Fernando, Ventura County, and Santa Clarita. Attorney Melissa C. Marsh has considerable experience handling business matters both nationally and internationally. We routinely assist our clients with incorporation, forming a California corporation, forming a California llc, partnership, annual minutes, shareholder meetings, director meetings, getting a taxpayer ID number (EIN), buying a business, selling a business, commercial lease review, employee disputes, independent contractors, construction, and personal matters such as preparing a will, living trust, power of attorney, health care directive, and more.