|
On March 27, 2000, in Ticketmaster
Corp. v. Tickets.com (U.S. District Court, C.D. Cal.), the court
recently held that for a Web site's terms and conditions to be binding,
they must be at the very least prominently displayed. What does
this mean? In short, a Web site owner should ensure that a link
to the Web site's "terms and conditions of use" are placed
in a large font somewhere near the top of the Web site's home page.
As it still remains unclear whether the prominent display of the
Web site's terms and conditions of use will be sufficient to bind
users to those terms, Web site owners should also consider converting
their terms and conditions of use into "click-through"
agreements. Click-through agreements are online legally binding
contracts that require the visitor or customer to mouse click an
"I accept" button before information can be accessed or
goods ordered. Why? The facts and ruling of the California court
in the Ticketmaster Case provides one reason.
Facts
Ticketmaster's Web site, which
offers tickets to various entertainment events, contains event pages
providing details on individual events. Tickets.com, which operates
a competing online ticket business, also provides information as
to where its users can purchase tickets that Tickets.com does not
sell. To provide this information, Tickets.com included deep links
to Ticketmaster's event pages on Ticketmaster's Web site. Ticketmaster
sued Tickets.com, alleging that Tickets.com violated Ticketmaster's
terms and conditions, which prohibited others from deep linking.
Ruling
The California court dismissed
Ticketmaster's claim after finding, among other things, that although
Ticketmaster's Web site contained a link to its terms and conditions
at the bottom of its home page, a binding contract is not created
simply by use of a Web site. The court's reasoning focused on the
way in which Ticketmaster's terms and conditions were displayed
on the Web site. The judge held that the terms and conditions of
use, located at the bottom of the Web site's home page and at no
other place on the site, did not create a binding contract. The
court further found that users were not required to assent to the
terms (e.g. click an "I accept" button), or even read
them. The judge, did however, leave open the possibility that Ticketmaster
might be able to prove that Tickets.com knew, or should have known,
about the terms and conditions of use, thus creating a binding contract.
Conclusion
Ticketmaster has since placed the
link to its terms and conditions on top of its home page, so that
it will be the first thing users see when visiting the Web site.
It is unclear, however, if prominently displaying terms and conditions
of use will be sufficient to bind users to those terms. To ensure
your terms of use are enforceable, Web site operators should consider
converting their terms and conditions into "click-through"
agreements. Click-through agreements are online legal terms requiring
the clicking of an "I accept" button before information
can be accessed or goods ordered. Essentially, with click-through
agreements, the Web site operator can prove the user accepted the
agreement; otherwise, the user would not have been able to use the
Web site to engage in any of these activities.
Non-clickable terms and conditions
of use, however, still may still be useful to put users on notice
of certain facts, such as the ownership of copyrights and trademarks;
notices required to qualify for safe harbors under the Digital Millennium
Copyright Act; references to data privacy policies; and notices
that links are not endorsements of third parties or their products.
The terms of a click-through agreement, however, are much more likely
to be enforced to disclaim implied warranties, to limit direct damages,
to exclude indirect damages, to choose a governing law, to require
arbitration, to require a suit to be brought in a particular jurisdiction,
or as in the Ticketmaster case, to limit the permitted uses of a
Web site.
For more information of what should
be contained in your terms of use, or to have your terms of use
reviewed, please feel free to contact me at my office at: 818-762-7831
or via e-mail at legalcorner@aol.com.
DISCLAIMER:
This article has been prepared by Melissa C. Marsh for the
benefit of clients and friends. Although prepared by a professional,
this article should not be used as a substitute for legal
advice because your specific factual circumstances may differ,
the laws of your jurisdiction may differ, your specific
situation may require different advice, or the laws may
have changed. Readers should not act upon the information
contained in this article without first seeking the advice
of a local licensed and practicing attorney.
If you have questions
relating to this article, please call (323) 655-1002 or
email: mmarsh@yourlegalcorner.com.
|