|
Introduction
The growth in the use of Internet
has resulted in an array of new claims being asserted not only against
the new cyber companies, but also the old brick and motar companies
who have recently engaged in Internet activities. Today, a company's
internet presence is quickly becoming an increasingly valuable asset.
So what's the problem? Well, unfortunately many companies do not
realize that the traditional comprehensive general liability policy
("CGL") and the tradition errors and omissions policy
("E&O") rarely cover internet-related losses nor many
of the new claims being asserted by or against the Internet-related
and technology part of these companies.
This article highlights some of
the shortcomings of the traditional CGL and E&O policies presents
the reader with the names of some new insurance products underwritten
specifically for software and hardware designers, computer consultants,
and content/service providers who face exposure from publication
of content or services on the Net. If your company engages in such
businesses, or if you maintain an Internet presence, and you do
not have an appropriate insurance policy, you should seriously consider
purchasing a technology related insurance policy a endorsement,
to cover Internet-related losses.
What The Traditional
CGL Insurance Policy Covers and Does Not Cover.
CGL policies are written to indemnify the policyholder for
liability for bodily injury or property damage. So what is "property
damage?" The CGL policy often states that for "property
damage" to be covered, there must be physical injury to tangible
property, or a loss of use of tangible property. So, why wouldn't
the computer be covered or your web pages? Some courts have held
that the destruction or loss of computer stored data or software
is not "property damage" because it involves only intangible
economic loss, not "tangible property". As a result, intangible
economic losses resulting from the failure of computer hardware
or software to perform its intended function may not be covered
by the traditional CGL policy. The traditional CGL policie also
generally excludes coverage for the cost to repair and/or replace
defective hardware and software that is designed or distributed
by the insured as well as any intangible, economic losses suffered
by a customer of the insured that results from a defect or malfunction
in the hardware or software sold by the insured.
In addition, while the traditional
CGL policy does provide advertising injury liability coverage, often
this does not protect the company advertising on the Internet. Under
the traditional CGL policy "advertising injury" is generally
defined to include "misappropriation of advertising ideas or
a style of doing business" or "infringement of copyright,
title or slogan." While some courts have held that this language
may cover claims for copyright infringement, trademark infringement,
trade name infringement, trade dress infringement, and certain related
common law claims of unfair competition, for there to be coverage
under the traditional CGL policy, any "advertising injury"
must be caused by an offense committed in the course of advertising
the insured's goods, products or services. So why is this inadequate?
First, the courts have repeatedly held that patent infringement
is not covered because it cannot occur in the course of an insured's
advertising activities; a patent is infringed by making, using,
or selling a patented invention, not by advertising it. Second,
the courts have held that the mere misappropriation of a trade secret
is not covered because the harm is caused by the misappropriation
of the trade secret, not by the advertising itself. It should be
noted however, that the courts have found coverage for the misappropriation
of trade secret claims where the liability arose from the misappropriation
of customer lists and marketing techniques that the insured used
to solicit the plaintiff's customers to buy competing products.
Thus, the traditional CGL policy fails to provide coverage for the
most common copyright and trademark infringement claims, such as
those where a software company is sued for copyright infringement
by a competitor who claims the insured copied and used its copyrighted
source code in a new product, or a claim for trademark infringement
by the owner of a trademark that was improperly used in a software
developer's video game.
What Is and Is
Not Covered By Traditional E&O Insurance.
Generally, the traditional E&O
policy is written to indemnify "professionals" for sums
they "become legally obligated to pay as damages that result
from claims made against the insured during the policy period for
any act, error or omission in professional services rendered . .
. ." Frequently, the E&O policy does not define covered
professional services to include liability arising from the insured's
products. In addition, the traditional E&O policy also typically
excludes coverage for any claim that results from the products manufactured,
distributed, or repaired by the insured as well as any claim of
property damage to the products manufactured, sold, or distributed
by the insured or claim of property damage to work performed by
or on behalf of the insured. In sum, the traditional E&O policy
may not cover product liability claims or claims to repair or replace
defective work by the insured.
Today, a major issue arising in
cases against software designers is whether the software at issue
constitutes a "good" that is subject to the terms of Article
2 of the Uniform Commercial Code ("UCC") or a "service."
While most courts should have little difficulty concluding that
the sale or license of "off-the-shelf" or shrink-wrapped
software is the sale of a "good" subject to the UCC, the
result may be less clear when the transaction involves custom-designed
software or hardware or a hybrid transaction involving the sale
of software and related support services. In California, the Federal
courts have generally found that transactions involving custom-designed
software packages and "turn-key" systems involving integrated
custom-designed hardware and software delivered ready to run constitute
a "good", even where consulting advice, repair services,
system upgrading or employee training are also included in the package.
Why is this important? Because, if the transaction in question is
found to be a "good" subject to Article 2 of the UCC,
a software designer's E&O policy most likely does not provide
coverage for certain types of claims asserted by a customer relating
to defects in a computer system supplied by the software designer.
Your Company's
Internet Risk Profile.
A company's internet Risk profile
depends on three basic factors: (1) the type of Internet activities
it conducts; (2) the extent to which the company is aware of its
potential exposure to classes and claims arising from its Internet
activities; and (3) extent to which the company has developed prevention
programs and contingency plans to deal with these Internet-related
risks.
Commercial use of the Internet falls into several categories, which
any given company may avail itself of. Some companies use their
Web site merely to advertise their own goods and services. Others
use their Web site as a vehicle to generate revenue by selling their
goods and services over the Net. Some companies avail themselves
of the advertising revenue that can be generated by selling ad space
on their Web site to third parties. And finally, some utilize the
Internet to generate revenue by providing professional advice.
New Technology-Related
Endorsements and Insurance Policies.
To fill the gaps existing in the
traditional CGL and E&O insurance policies, the insurance industry
now provides specialized technology-related liability insurance
policies and endorsements. Please note that the term "Policy"
as used below may be replaced with the term, "Endorsement."
Be sure to ask your insurance agent if any of these policies or
endorsements apply to your business.
1. Electronic Errors or Omissions
Policy ("Electronic E&O"). This policy typically
covers "damages the insured becomes legally obligated to pay
for any claim arising out of a negligent act, error or omission,
by or on behalf of the insured resulting in the failure of your
electronic products to perform the function or serve the purpose
intended after installation and testing." The definition of
"your electronic products" includes "electronic goods,
products or services, manufactured, sold, handled, distributed or
disposed by" the insured, including any warranties or representations
made at any time with respect to the fitness, quality or performance
of the insured's products. Unlike the traditional CGL policy, an
Electronic E&O policy covers certain economic damages and intangible
losses other than property damage that are caused by computer software
or hardware products. This includes loss of data, business interruption,
and loss of revenue claims asserted by customers. Covered professional
services under an Electronic E&O policy is also broadened to
include the insured's product, thereby eliminating the potential
gap in coverage under a traditional E&O policy arising from
the "good" vs. "service" distinction.
2. Computer Software and Services
Errors or Omissions Policy. Like the Electronic E&O policy,
this policy provides coverage for "damages the insured becomes
legally obligated to pay for any claim arising out of a negligent
act, error or omission . . . by or on behalf of the insured . .
. in the performance of or failure to perform electronic data processing
. . . other computer services . . . or in the failure of software
products to perform the function or serve the purpose intended."
The term "other computer services" is defined broadly
to include hardware and software consulting, analysis or design,
computer hardware maintenance for others, and the distribution or
sale of computer hardware.
3. Damage to Your Electronic
Products Policy. This policy covers "any claim arising
out of damage to your electronic products," defined as "the
lesser of the cost of . . . repair . . . alteration . . . or replacement
(its selling price less your profits), of your electronic products
arising out of the sudden and accidental physical injury to such
products or any part thereof, after installation, testing and acceptance
by the user." The policy is generally intended to cover claims
relating to the cost to repair or replace a custom "turn-key"
computer system, designed by the insured, caused by a "sudden
and accidental" failure of the system.
4. Multimedia Liability Insurance"
Policy. This policy is generally written on a specific peril
basis to cover claims arising out of specified offenses "committed
in the course of multi-media activity by or on behalf of insured
. . . ." "Multi-media activity" is broadly defined
in the policy as "creating, producing, distributing, exhibiting,
broadcasting, advertising or publicizing matter," defined as
"printed, verbal, numerical, audio or visual expression, or
any other form of expression, fixed in software or any other medium."
The covered offenses include copyright and trademark infringement,
plagiarism or unauthorized use of titles, formats, ideas, characters,
plots, performances of artists, or other program material, invasion
of privacy, libel, slander, and "other forms of defamation."
The policy eliminates the advertising nexus requirement under a
CGL policy, thereby providing broader protection than is presently
available under a standard CGL policy affording advertising injury
liability protection. The policy appears particularly well suited
for software developers, web designers and publishers, CD designers,
and other businesses that face exposure from publication of content
or services on the Internet or through other media.
5. Media Liability Policies.
These policies are offered by a large number of insurers. These
policies often provide coverage for defamation, invasion of privacy,
misappropriation of name or likeness and violation of intellectual
property rights arising from the insured's dissemination of information
in covered media. The covered media specified in the policy may
include web-sites, if you so specify. Although media liability policies
generally do not cover errors and omissions in providing services,
some insurers will offer endorsement to provide such coverage.
6. Hacker - Virus Policies.
A number of insurers, including CIGNA, CNA, AIG, and various Lloyds
of London underwriters offer hacker - virus policies. These policies
provide both first and third party coverage. The first party coverage
addresses damage to the insured's own equipment or data while the
third party coverage addresses claims by third parties asserting
that the policyholder is responsible for hacker or virus damage
to its computers or electronic data. Hacker - virus products generally
contain a criminal acts exclusions for acts of the insured's employees
and most only provide coverage for claims made in the coverage period.
7. Broad e-commerce coverage.
Broad e-commerce coverage is offered by AIG, Chubb, Zurich and various
Lloyds of London underwriters. The policies that fall within this
category generally include elements of first and third party coverage
for risks arising from hacking, theft of data, intellectual property
and credit card information, as well as business interruption coverage
for web site disruptions. Products developed by Marsh U.S.A. and
underwritten by a number of insurers also incorporate E&O and
media liability features.
It should be noted, however, that
many of these new Internet-related policies often require as a condition
precedent to receiving coverage, that the company seeking coverage
undergo, and pay for, a risk assessment of their web practices.
Underwriters use the information gathered during the risk-assessment
to determine whether to grant coverage, and the type of coverage
needed. This risk-assessment survey may be performed by the underwriter,
an e-commerce consultant, a law firm, or some combination of the
above.
Conclusion
Businesses in the technology industry
simply cannot afford to be unsophisticated when it comes to purchasing
insurance coverage for their potential liabilities. An uninsured
loss could be devastating to the financial well being of your business.
Consult your insurance broker or one of the companies mentioned
above to determine whether any additional insurance coverage is
warranted.
DISCLAIMER:
This article has been prepared by Melissa C. Marsh for the
benefit of clients and friends. Although prepared by a professional,
this article should not be used as a substitute for legal
advice because your specific factual circumstances may differ,
the laws of your jurisdiction may differ, your specific
situation may require different advice, or the laws may
have changed. Readers should not act upon the information
contained in this article without first seeking the advice
of a local licensed and practicing attorney.
If you have questions
relating to this article, please call (323) 655-1002 or
email: mmarsh@yourlegalcorner.com.
|